Blog · September 2026

When a Family Story Raises a Medical Question: The Silence Between Two Heartbeats and the HIE Care Gap

How one family's experience raises questions about post-discharge neurological care—and how lived experience can help shape future HIE research

By A T M Haidar Khan

The Silence Between Two Heartbeats began with a deeply personal experience: a newborn medical crisis, hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE), seizures, uncertainty, and a family's transition from the intensely monitored environment of neonatal intensive care to life at home.

But the book raises a question extending far beyond one family:

What happens when a newborn leaves the NICU, but the neurological risks do not necessarily leave with them?

That question represents an important public-interest issue and a potential area for further medical research.

The book does not claim to have clinically established a treatment gap. Rather, through lived experience, it brings attention to questions about the continuum of care after discharge—questions involving seizure surveillance, neurological follow-up, parent education, and the limitations of monitoring outside the hospital.

From Continuous Monitoring to Home

Inside a NICU, newborns at neurological risk can have access to specialized physicians, nurses, diagnostic technology, and neurological monitoring.

EEG and amplitude-integrated EEG (aEEG) play important roles in evaluating neonatal seizures. This is particularly significant because some neonatal seizures may be electrographic-only, meaning that seizure activity can occur without obvious outward clinical signs.

Then comes discharge.

For a family, the difference between these environments can be profound.

The monitors are gone. The specialists are no longer a few steps away. Parents become the people observing the child for much of the day and night.

That transition raises a difficult question:

How can a parent recognize a neurological event that may not be visibly recognizable?

This is one of the areas where The Silence Between Two Heartbeats brings a potential gap in the continuum of HIE care into public discussion.

The Potential Gap the Book Raises

The issue is not simply whether a particular home-monitoring device exists.

The broader question concerns what happens between intensive neonatal treatment and longer-term life at home.

The book's lived experience raises questions concerning post-discharge seizure surveillance; recognition of subtle or electrographic-only seizures; parent education before and after discharge; continuity of neurological follow-up; communication between clinicians and families; and limitations of currently available home monitoring.

These should not be interpreted as findings from a clinical study. They are questions generated by lived experience that warrant further professional and scientific investigation. That distinction is essential.

A Book Cannot Prove a Treatment Gap. It Can Reveal a Question.

A personal account cannot determine standards of care, establish clinical efficacy, or demonstrate that a particular medical intervention would improve outcomes. Those conclusions require properly designed scientific research.

But medical research does not begin only with answers. It begins with questions.

And some important research questions originate not in laboratories but in the experiences of patients, parents, and caregivers.

How should seizure risk be communicated to parents of newborns affected by HIE before discharge? How effectively can subtle or electrographic-only seizures be recognized outside a hospital? Which infants would benefit from additional neurological surveillance? Could future technologies provide safe and clinically meaningful monitoring in selected home settings? How should neonatal, neurological, pediatric, and family care remain connected after discharge?

The Silence Between Two Heartbeats does not claim to answer these questions. It asks why they should be investigated.

How the Book Can Contribute to HIE Research

The book's potential research contribution is therefore different from that of a scientific paper, dataset, or clinical trial.

Its contribution lies in patient- and family-centered research agenda-setting.

Researchers can use lived experience to identify questions worthy of systematic investigation. A family may encounter a problem at a point in the care pathway that researchers or clinicians experience differently.

Clinicians see what happens inside the NICU. Families also experience what happens after the NICU.

Bringing those perspectives together can help identify subjects for qualitative research, prospective clinical investigation, technological development, improved discharge education, and long-term follow-up research.

The book may therefore contribute to HIE research dialogue by drawing attention to questions surrounding seizure surveillance after discharge, parent education, continuity of neurological care, home-monitoring limitations, caregiver decision-making, and long-term family support.

The Importance of the Family Perspective

Medical records can document diagnosis, treatment, medications, EEG findings, discharge instructions, and scheduled follow-up. They cannot completely document what it feels like for a parent to take a neurologically vulnerable newborn home.

The parent experiences the hours between appointments. The nights without NICU monitors. The uncertainty about whether a movement is ordinary newborn behavior or something requiring medical attention. The decisions about when to wait, when to call a physician, and when to seek emergency care.

These experiences do not constitute clinical evidence. But they are data about the human experience of care, and they can help researchers determine which questions deserve closer investigation.

Why This Is a Public-Interest Issue

HIE is not experienced only by a newborn. Its consequences can affect parents, siblings, caregivers, clinicians, educational systems, and communities.

For that reason, research should not be limited to what happens during the initial medical emergency. Questions about what happens after discharge—neurological follow-up, family education, developmental surveillance, caregiver support, and access to appropriate monitoring—also deserve attention.

The public-interest contribution of The Silence Between Two Heartbeats lies partly in making those questions visible. It takes an intensely private experience and places it into a broader conversation about how families navigate serious newborn illness.

From Lived Experience to Research

The book should not be interpreted as evidence that every infant with HIE needs home EEG monitoring, that existing standards of care are inadequate, or that a particular technology or treatment would improve outcomes. Those are scientific questions requiring evidence.

Instead, The Silence Between Two Heartbeats occupies another potentially useful place in the research ecosystem: it documents questions that become visible when medicine is experienced from the family side of the hospital door.

A family's experience should never substitute for scientific research. But neither should an important research question be dismissed simply because lived experience brought it into focus.

A Question Worth Investigating

At the center of The Silence Between Two Heartbeats is one child and one family.

The questions emerging from that experience are much larger: How can the transition from NICU monitoring to home be improved? How should families be educated about neurological risks that may be difficult to recognize? Which newborns require closer post-discharge neurological surveillance? What role could future monitoring technologies play? How can clinicians and researchers better understand what families experience between medical appointments? And where might improvements in the continuum of care produce better experiences—or potentially better outcomes—for children affected by HIE?

These questions require researchers, clinicians, engineers, families, and institutions to investigate them carefully.

That may ultimately be one of the book's most important public-interest contributions.

The Silence Between Two Heartbeats does not claim to have discovered a medical answer. It brings a potential gap into view, documents the lived experience behind it, and asks a question that deserves further research.

About the Author

A T M Haidar Khan is the author of The Silence Between Two Heartbeats. Born in Bangladesh, he later moved to the United States and pursued higher education in the United Kingdom. He previously wrote for national and international newspapers and magazines and currently serves as a civil servant with the City of New York. The book is drawn from his family's lived experience and explores newborn medical crisis, caregiving, disability, family resilience, separation, dignity, and hope.

Medical and Research Note

This article and The Silence Between Two Heartbeats are based on lived experience and are not medical research, medical advice, or evidence establishing a clinical treatment gap. References to potential gaps are intended to identify questions for further clinical and scientific investigation. Decisions concerning HIE, seizures, neurological monitoring, treatment, or follow-up should be made by qualified healthcare professionals based on an individual child's circumstances.

← Back to Blog